INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES TO MEDICAL MANAGEMENT
You hear the voice of the nurse saying:
“Doctor, you have a new chronic pain patient in room 1”
- What are the Initial thoughts that would come into your mind?
- Very negative connotations
- “Drug-seeker”
- What would be your concerns?
- Medical
- Legal
How would you approach this patient?
- Subjective (History)
- Patient’s perspective
- Rapport a key
- Communication skills critical
- Positive bedside manner helpful
- Medical info as you’ve learned
- CC, HPI, Past Med/Surg History, etc
- Objective (Examination)
- Vital Signs
- General appearance/affect
- Musculoskeletal system
- Neurologic
- Assessment and Plan
- Diagnostic tests
- Treatment thoughts
- Behavioral/lifestyle issues
- Physical therapy
- Medications
Goals and Objectives
- Recognize the critical value of a patient-centered interview in patients with chronic pain
- Review how to minimize conflict in dealing with pain issues
- Review signs to distinguish behavioral from physiologic pain
- Explore integrative approaches to pain management
- Review pharmacologic approaches to augment other strategies
- Address the role and use of narcotics
Pain Management creates many challenges in treatment
- Subjective vs. objective issues
- Perception is a baseline component
- Recognizing the power of one's own buttons and emotions
HOW TO APPROACH A PATIENT WITH PAIN
- Patient-Centered Approaches
Communication Skills
- Non-judgmental
- Avoid immediate “distrust” if possible
- Watch nonverbal cues very closely
- Open-ended questions
- Facilitation
- Recognizing and responding to emotions
- Fear
- Anger/Frustration
- Time management
- Negotiating common ground
- Medical information must be obtained
- Nature of injury/problem
- Symptoms
- Previous treatments
- History of poor relationship with controlled drugs
- Biopsychosocial spiritual information must be obtained
- Support system
- Work to minimize/address stress factors of isolation and control
- Coping skills
- Identify activities limited by pain
- Ask patient to give his/her expectations of treatment, and to set functional goals
- Identify activities limited by pain
- Ask patient to give their expectations of treatment
- Ask patient to set functional goals
- Identify and address any sleep disorders
- Be open about your own boundaries
- With respect to medical management
- With respect to availability to patient
- Set expectation about patient’s responsibility for their health and healing
- Patient must be actively involved in own care plan
Several studies have demonstrated health benefits of patient-centered interview alone
- Make diagnosis
Distinguishing between physical and behavioral components of pain
- In 1980, Dr. Waddell studied 26 clinical signs in 350 patients
- Eight behavioral signs were consistently reliable and reproducible for suggesting non-structural pain
- Patients with physical back problems can demonstrate Waddell signs because of fear, desire to please
Physical and behavioral components of pain
- “Non-organic” pain does not mean “No” pain
- The predictive value is improved if >/= 3 signs present
- Base decisions on tests and treatment
- on the patient
- not the presence or absence of any one sign or finding
EXAMINING SUCH A PATIENT
Waddell Signs
- Superficial tenderness of skin
- Physical pain does not make the skin hurt
- Very rare in patients with demonstrated pathology
- Non-anatomic tenderness
- Crosses dermatomes or somatic boundaries
- Magnuson’s Test: nonreproducible localization of pain (it moves during the exam)
- Axial loading
- Pressing on the top of the head in a standing patient
- Should not cause LBP
- Neck pain can occur
- Simulated rotation
- Standing patient, with shoulders and hips rotated in unison
- No pain should occur as the back is not stressed
- Distracted straight-leg raise
- Performed when hip is flexed with knee straight
- Organic pain will have same results with both standard and distracted SLR
- The “flip” test adds stretch to sciatic nerve: dorsiflex foot with knee straight
- Reverse flip (plantar flexion) relieves sciatic pain
- Regional sensory change
- Sensory changes should follow expected neurologic/dermatomal patterns
- Global (stocking) changes rarely has traumatic cause
- Few spinal conditions involve more than 1 or 2 roots
- Carefully check and recheck sensory changes on each side and in affected areas to look for inconsistencies
- Regional weakness
- Muscle weakness follows expected patterns
- Any test of 5/5 suggests normal muscle group function
- True weakness in a muscle
- Results in smooth overpowering with resistance;
- “Breakaway” or sudden giving way suggests behavioral origins
- Overreaction
- An exaggerated, nonreproducible reaction to light touch
- Also inappropriate sighing, grimacing, collapse
Other Signs to Check
- If limping, look at shoe wear pattern
- Check canes, braces and supports for wear
- Look at callous patterns in laborers
- If unable to work
- They disappear in 3 weeks
- Mankopf’s test:
- Palpation of painful area should raise pulse by 5%
- O’Donoghue’s maneuver:
- Passive ROM greater than active with physiologic pain
- Suspect behaviorial if reversed
- Hoover’s test:
- Hold heels of supine patient up off table
- When one leg is raised easily, the test is negative
- If this is difficult, someone with physiologic pain will compensate by pushing contralateral leg down against your hand
- Lack of this downward pressure is a positive behavioral sign
Remember:
- Know about behavioral aspects of pain
- Try to avoid playing “detective”
- To “Prove” the patient is “drug-seeking”
- To be punitive
- Creates “You” against “Them”
Basic Integrative Approaches
These include
- Behavioral choices/issues
- Diet
- Anti-inflammatory for RA, asthma: less animal fat, omega 3 vs omega 6
- Exercise/weight loss
- Personal habits
- Role of nicotine in chronic pain
- Choice of “relaxants” like alcohol
- Coping skills & support system
- Stress reduction efforts and options
- Multi-disciplinary involvement
- Psychologic support/counseling
- Behavioral and cognitive approaches
- Patient education an important factor at decreasing fear and anxiety
- Group process -Pain group
- Works to improve coping and reframing of pain issues
Other Frequently Utilized and Accepted Approaches
These include
- Placebo Effects
- Influence on patient outcome in all cases
- Often greater than 30% effect frequently cited
- Similar effects to meds
- No way to predict
- Emerging research on nocebos
- Mind-Body
- Simple Relaxation Techniques
- Mindfulness Meditation
- 225 patients studied for 4 years
- Significant impact on McGill Melzack Pain Rating Index
- Psychoneuroimmunology
- Relationship of stress to immune/endocrine systems
- Psychological stress and myocardial ischemia
- Plays key role in patient’s perception of pain
- Isolation and autonomy main factors in creating negative stress
- Hypnosis
- Can treat pain in acute situations
- Fractures, Surgery
- Acupuncture (NIH consensus statement)
- Postop dental pain
- HA, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain
- Conflicting meta-analyses in chronic pain
- May not be effective in nonspecific chronic low back pain, but existing studies felt to be poor
- Manipulative Therapy for LBP
- Agency for Health Care Policy and Research supports it
- 1998 study
- 321 acute with chiropractor and physical therapy
- small but significant improvement compared with minimal intervention
- New study suggesting massage may be as good or more effective than acupuncture or state of the art self care
- Osteopathic manipulation
- Other Approaches Utilized but not Well-accepted
- New research
- Writing about emotionally traumatic experiences reduces symptoms in
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Asthma
- Magnetic Therapy
- Animal models show blockade of dorsal root ganglion neurons
- Extensive article in PM & R, August 1999, reviewing criteria/research utilizing magnetic therapy
- Strong evidence for EMF in bone, neurologic, pain and sleep disorders.
- 26 of 33 double masked studies showed beneficial effects.
- Caution re: non-scientific claims that abound
- TENS/Pulsatile EMF (PEMF) established modalities for bone and orthopedic injuries
- Big “Cottage Industry” at present
- Aromatherapy
- Early clinical trials in process
- Uncertain and varied mode of action
- Placebo, parasympathetic response to touch/smell, pharmacokinetic potential of drug by oils or pharmacologically active ingredients all proposed
- Massachusetts State Board of Nursing has accepted it as part of holistic nursing care
US Department of Health and Human Services Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Pain Management
- Ia – Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Ib – Evidence obtained from at least one randomized controlled trial.
- IIa– Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed controlled study without randomization.
- IIb – Evidence obtained from at least one other type of well-designed quasi-experimental study.
- III – Evidence obtained from well-designed descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlational studies, and case studies.
- IV – Evidence obtained from expert committee reports or opinions and/or clinical experiences of respected authorities.
Simple Relaxation
- Jaw relaxation, progressive muscle relaxation, simple imagery
- Good meta-analyses
- Time 3-5 minutes
- Simple Relaxation (music)
- Controlled trials
Complex Relaxation
- Biofeedback
- Controlled trials
- Time skilled personnel/ special equipment
- Imagery
- Controlled trials
- Skilled personnel
Education/Instruction
- Good meta-analyses
- Time 5-15 minutes
TENS
- Good meta-analyses
- Needs skilled personnel, special equipment
New standards for pain management in hospitals
Joint Commission of Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAHO), July 2001
JCAHO Standards
- Patient has the right to appropriate assessment and management of pain
- Assess existence, nature and intensity of pain
- Assure staff competency at assessing and managing pain
- Establish policies that support appropriate prescription of effective meds
- Educate patients and families about effective management
- Assess patient needs for symptom management at discharge
- Recognize recently publicized issue of ADR and deaths due to prescription drugs
- Era of new oversights and regulations dawning
Pharmacologic Classes Available
- Analgesics
- Acetaminophen
- Caffeine
- Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
- Many classes
- Worth trying one from several before moving on
- New COX-2 inhibitors useful adjuncts with decreased GI effects
- Muscle relaxants
- Cyclobenzaprine
- Methocarbamol
- Carisoprodol (Soma)
- Metabolized to meprobamate (Miltown)
- Risk of habituation, addiction
- Benzodiazepines
- Antidepressants
- Tricyclics - especially with neurogenic pain
- Pain relief before antidepressant activity
- Receptors unknown
- Improve sleep
- Significant ADRs
- SSRIs
- Increasing experience suggest worth trying
- As effective as TCAs but with faster onset
- Fluoxetine (Prozac) most commonly used in class
- Trazodone (Desyrel)
- Maprotiline (Ludiomil),
- Bupropion (Wellbutrin)
- Anticonvulsants
- Carbamazepine (Tegretol) - most commonly for neuropathic pain
- Gabapentin (Neurontin) most commonly used now in this class
- Analog of GABA
- Remarkably few side effects
- Lamotrigine (Lamictal)
- Phenytoin
- Valproic acid
- Narcotics
- Previously felt to be inappropriate in chronic pain management
- Now becoming more accepted aspect of management
- Expectation of physicians to treat pain; consequences for failure to do so
- Current studies reassuring about efficacy, and not creating addiction
- Suggest one can
- Avoid toxicity,
- Aberrant behavior,
- Mental debility
- Provide pain relief
Addiction
- Physical dependence is the development of abstinence symptoms
- Focus is on symptom relief and return to function
- Addiction is characterized by
- Loss of control
- Compulsive use
- Preoccupation with getting and using the medication
- Continued use despite harm
- Inducing addiction with use of narcotics is rare
- Aggressive demand for narcotics is not predictable indicator of addictive potential
- Incomplete treatment or PRN approach does create “pseudo-addictive” behavior
- Demands for med
- Anger, strong emotion
- Focus on medication itself
Recommendations for Use of Narcotics
- Have clear approach to assessing and managing chronic pain
- Follow protocols consistently
- Document very clearly
- Narcotics rarely appropriate as sole approach to pain control
- Use long-acting agents on scheduled basis
- Can use shorter-acting for breakthrough
- Decision to use is
- Made mutually by the patient and physician
- Common ground negotiated
- Narcotic use is not a right or privilege
Candidates for Narcotics
- Have established diagnosis consistent with pain syndrome
- Be reliable and willing to accept their responsibility in plan
- Have failed other approaches
- Not using illegal drugs currently
- Hx of previous addiction increases risk of failure
Narcotics Contract – (Ethics)
- List diagnosis
- List functional goals and expectations
- Discussion of risks and benefits of narcotic
- Agreement to participate in integrated approach to pain management
- Agreement to take meds exactly as prescribed
- Agreement to get prescriptions from only one physician
- Designation of one pharmacy for medications
- Understanding that lost/stolen meds will not be replaced, and that early requests for refill will not occur
- Signatures of patient and physician with date
- Each visit should review whether functional goals obtained, and explore for signs of habituation or tolerance
- Early dosage adjustments to reach therapeutic levels should not be viewed as habituation
- Tolerance to Adverse Drug Reactions usually occurs within one to two weeks, but does not reflect occurrence of tolerance to analgesia
Options – Morphine Sulfate
- Has active metabolites, morphine 3 & 6 glucuronide
- Comes as sustained and immediate release
- Once a day version available
- Onset of sustained release slow
- Some stigma, but generally acceptable
Options – Oxycodone (Percocet)
- Has sustained and immediate release, with onset about the same
- No active metabolites
- One to one conversion to MS
- No stigma
Options – Methadone
- Inexpensive
- Potent
- Requires more regular dosing
- Significant social stigma (heroin detox) may limit utility
Dosing Guidelines
- No maximum or predictable dose for any one patient
- Correct dose is
- The one that controls the pain
- Improves the function
- With tolerable side effects
- Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
- Tend to decrease within 1-2 weeks
- Analgesic properties maintained
- Constipation
Putting it into Practice
- Patient centered Process
- Individualized by patient, diagnosis
- Identify approaches patient has utilized, expectations
- Identify coping skills and support system
- Discuss evidence-based versus anecdotal support
- Negotiation of functional (and realistic) goals
- Develop treatment plan with goals listed
- Involve patient at each step in their care plan
- Address
- Patient Education
- Behavioral and Lifestyle Choices
- Pharmacologic including prescriptions and OTC
- Non-Pharmacologic approaches
- Relaxation
- Sleep